Abstract
The significance of diagnostic problem and treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is
based on high specific weight of this pathology within morbidity and mortality of population
with tendency towards the increase of these rates as well as with high mortality rates in terms of
complication development. The main risk factors for AAA development are the following: age
of 65 and older, male gender, smoking (including past history), for women - presence of
aneurysm in first-degree relatives. However mortality rate in Russian Federation achieves 7.5%
even after elective off-pump surgeries. High mortality rate in severe somatic patients, traumacy
and rate of complication development after off-pump surgery contribute to the search of new
methods for AAA treatment.
Advantages of endoprosthetic replacement of infrarenal aorta aneurysms are the following:
minor traumatization, insignificant hemorrhage, absence of enteroplegia, pain syndrome and
systemic complications. The most common complications of endovascular treatment for
infrarenal aorta aneurysms are blood leakages, dislocation, stent-graft thrombosis and aneurysm
rupture.
References
Бакулев А. Н., Комаров Б. Д. Современные принципы хирургического лечения больных аневризмами аорты. Хирургия аорты и крупных магистральных сосудов. М., 1964. С. 84-88.
Бокерия Л. А., Гудкова Р. Г. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия - 2010. Болезни и врожденные аномалии системы кровообращения. М.: НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2011. С. 127.
Adelman M. A., Rockman C. B., Lamparello P. J. et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair since the FDA approval. Are we going too far? // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2002. Vol. 43, № 3. P. 359-367.
Arko F. R., Filis K. A., Siedel S. A. et al. Intrasac flow velocities predict sealing of type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2003. Vol. 138, № 1. P. 8-15.
Blankensteijn J. D., de Jong S. E., Prinssen M. et al. Dutch randomised endovascular aneurysm management (DREAM) trial group. Two year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair abdominal aortic aneurysms // N. Engl. J. Med. 2005. Vol. 352. P. 2398-2405.
Bush R. L., Johnston M. L., Hedayati N. et al. Performance of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients results Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 45, № 2. P. 227-233.
Buth J., Van Marrewijk C. J., Harris P. L. et al. on behalf of the EUROSTAR collaborators. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience // N. Engl. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 35. P. 211-221.
Chahvan S., Comerota A. J., Pigott J. P. et al. Elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with endovascular or open repair: the first decade // J. Vasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 258-262.
Chutter T. A., Faruqi R. M., Sawhney R. et al. Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm // J. Vasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 34, № 1. P. 98-105.
Darling R. S., Messina C. R., Morrison G. et al. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case of early resection // Circulation. 1976. Vol. 56 (Suppl. 2). P. 161-164.
Drury D., Michaels J. A., Jones L., Ayiku L. Systematic review of recent evidence for the safety and efficacy of elective endovascular repair in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm // Br. J. Surg. 2005. Vol. 92, № 8. P. 937-946.
Dubenec S. R., White G. H., Pasenau J. et al. Endotension. A review of current views on pathophysiology and treatment // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2003. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 553-557.
Dubost C., Allary M., Oeconomos N. Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: reestablishment of the continuity by a pre-served human arterial graft, with result after five months // AMA Arch. Surg. 1952. Vol. 64, №3. P. 405-408.
EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 365. P. 2187-2192.
EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 365. P. 2179-2186.
Gray A. J., Landsdown M., Hargraves C. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a service in need of surgery? A report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. London, 2005.
Greenhalgh R. M., Brown L. C., Kwong G. P. et al. EVAR Trial Participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 364. P. 843-848.
Lange C., Leurs L. J., Buth J., Myhre H. O. EUROSTAR collaborators. Endovascular repair abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: an analysis based on EUROSTAR data // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 42, № 4. P. 624-630
Leurs L. J., Buth J., Harris P. L., Blankensteijn J. D. Impact of study design on outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A comparison between the randomised controlled DREAM trial and the observational EUROSTAR registry // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 33, № 2. P. 172-176.
Linsen M. A., Jongkind V., Nio D. et al. Pararenal aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated endografts // J. Vasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 56, № 1. Р. 238-246.
Moulakakis K. G., Mylonas S. N., Avgerinos E. et al. The chimney graft technique for preserving visceral vessels during endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies // J. Vasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 55, № 5. Р. 1497-1503.
Parodi J. C., Palmaz J. C., Barone H. D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 1991. Vol. 5. P. 491-499.
Prinssen M., Verhoeven E. L., Buth J. et al. Dutch randomised endovascular aneurysm management (DREAM) trial group. A randomised trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms // N. Engl. J. Med. 2004. Vol. 351. P. 1607-1618.
Saratzis A., Mohamed S. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the geriatric population // J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2012. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 285-291.
Teruya T. H., Ayerdi J., Solis M. M. et al. Treatment of type III endoleak with an aortouniiliac stent-graft // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 17, № 2. P. 123-128.
United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms // N. Engl. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 346. P. 1445-1452.
U. S. Preventiv Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: recommendation statement // Ann. Intern. Med. 2005. Vol. 142, № 3. P. 198-202.
Volodos N. L., Karpovich I. P., Troyan V. I. et al. Clinical experience of the use of self-fixing synthetic prostheses for remote endoprosthetics of the thoracic and the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries through the femoral artery and as intraoperative endoprosthesis for aorta reconstruction // Vasa Suppl. 1991. Vol. 33. P. 93-95.
Wanhainen A. How to define an abdominal aortic aneurysm influence on epidemiology and clinical practice // Scand. J. Surg. 2008. Vol. 97, № 2. P. 105-109.
