Abstract
This review is devoted to the problem of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, its diagnosis, treatment
and prognosis. Currently, this topic is quite new and not fully studied. Questions on diagnosis and treatment at different
stages of the disease and in its different forms cause heated debate among clinicians around the world, which
explains the rather contradictory data from different sources. The increasing frequency of occurrence and high mortality
are proof of the relevance of the study of this issue and require a more thorough approach to its diagnosis and
treatment of these patients. This review contains the most recent data from the world literature on the study of this
problem.
References
- Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic
stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection
fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1097–735.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.051
- Tribouilloy C., Rusinaru D., Marechaux S., Castel A.L.,
Debry N., Maizel J. et al. Low-gradient, low-flow severe
aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction:
characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015; 65: 55–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.080
- Tribouilloy C., Rusinaru D. Diagnosis of paradoxical
low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis: A complex process.
Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017; 110 (3): 135–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.01.003
- Hachicha Z., Dumesnil J.G., Bogaty P., Pibarot P. Paradoxical
low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite
preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload
and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007; 115:
2856–64. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681
- Dumesnil J.G., Pibarot P., Carabello B. Paradoxical low
flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite
preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications
for diagnosis and treatment. Eur. Heart J. 2010; 31:
281–9. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361
- Barasch E., Fan D., Chukwu E.O., Han J., Passick M.,
Petillo F. et al. Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal
left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular
gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights.
J. Heart Valve Dis. 2008; 17: 81–8.
- Cramariuc D., Cioffi G., Rieck A.E., Devereux R.B.,
Staal E.M., Ray S. et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in
asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and
systolic function from the SEAS substudy. J. Am. Coll.
Cardiol. Img. 2009; 2: 390–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.021
- Lancellotti P., Donal E., Magne J., O'Connor K., Moonen
M.L., Cosyns B. et al. Impact of global left ventricular
afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic
severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking
study. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2010; 11: 537–43.
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq014
- Herrmann S., Stork S., Niemann M., Lange V., Strotmann
J.M., Frantz S., Beer M. et al. Low-gradient aortic
valve stenosis: myocardial fibrosis and its influence on
function and outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011; 58:
402–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.059
- Minners J., Allgeier M., Gohlke-Baerwolf C., Kienzle R.P.,
Neumann F.J., Jander N. Inconsistent grading of aortic
valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies
in patients with apparently normal left ventricular
function. Heart. 2010; 96: 1463–8. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.181982
- Lancellotti P., Magne J., Donal E., Davin L., O'Connor
K., Rosca M. et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic
severe aortic stenosis. Insights from the new
proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J. Am.
Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 59: 235–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072
- Adda J., Mielot C., Giorgi R., Cransac F., Zirphile X.,
Donal E. et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic
stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with
severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle
tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circ.
Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012; 5: 27–35. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.967554
- Hachicha Z., Dumesnil J.G., Pibarot P. Usefulness of the
valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in
asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;
54: 1003–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.079
- Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. State-of-the-art article: improving
assessment of aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
2012; 60: 169–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.078
- Pibarot P., Clavel M.A. Management of paradoxical lowflow,
low-gradient aortic stenosis: Need for an integrated
approach, including assessment of symptoms, hypertension,
and stenosis severity. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015; 65:
1097–735. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.030
- Connolly H.M., Oh J.K., Schaff H.V., Roger V.L., Osborn
S.L., Hodge D.O. et al. Severe aortic stenosis with
low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients.
Circulation. 2000; 101: 1940–6. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1940
- Cawley P.J., Maki J.H., Otto C.M. Cardiovascular magnetic
resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique
and validation. Circulation. 2009; 119: 468–78.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742486
- Cueff C., Serfaty J.M., Cimadevilla C., Laissy J.P., Himbert
D., Tubach F. et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification
using multislice computed tomography: correlation
with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and
clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction.
Heart. 2011; 97: 721–6. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.198853
- Burwash I.G., Lortie M., Pibarot P., de Kemp R.A.,
Graf S., Mundigler G. et al. Myocardial blood flow in
patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: differences
between true and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis.
Results from the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-
Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study. Heart. 2008; 94: 1627–33.
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135475
- Blais C., Burwash I.G., Mundigler G., Dumensil J.G.,
Loho N., Rader F. et al. Projected valve area at normal
flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in
patients with low flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the
multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis)
study. Circulation. 2006; 113: 711–21. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678
- Clavel M.A., Burwash I.G., Mundigler G., Dumesnil J.G.,
Baumgartner H., Bergler-Klein J. et al. Validation of conventional
and simplified methods to calculate projected
valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow,
low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True
or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J. Am. Soc.
Echocardiogr. 2010; 23: 380–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.002
- Picano E., Pibarot P., Lancellotti P., Monin J.L., Bonow
R.O. The emerging role of exercise testing and stress
echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J. Am. Coll.
Cardiol. 2009; 54: 2251–60. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76466-3_36
- Bermejo J., Yotti R. Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.
Value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing. Heart.
2007; 93: 298–302. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.066860
- Tribouilloy C., Levy F., Rusinaru D., Gueret P., Petit-
Eisenmann H., Baleynaud S. et al. Outcome after aortic
valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic
stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress
echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53:
1865–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.026
- Azevedo C.F., Nigri M., Higuchi M.L., Pomerantzeff P.M.,
Spina G.S., Sampaio R.O. et al. Prognostic significance
of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology
and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe
aortic valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010; 56:
278–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.074
- Mewton N., Liu C.Y., Croisille P., Bluemke D.,
Lima J.A.C. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular
magnetic resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
2011; 57: 891–903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.013
- Clavel M.A., Dumesnil J.G., Capoulade R., Mathieu P.,
Sénéchal M., Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic
stenosis, small valve area and low-flow, low-gradient despite
preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
2012; 60: 1259–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc. 2011.12.054
- Malouf J., Le Tourneau T., Pellikka P., Sundt T.M.,
Scott C., Schaff H.V. et al. Aortic valve stenosis in community
medical practice: determinants of outcome and
implications for aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac.
Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012; 144 (6): 1421–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.075
- Belkin R.N., Khalique O., Aronow W.S., Ahn C.,
Sharma M. Outcomes and survival with aortic valve
replacement compared with medical therapy in patients
with low-, moderate-, and severe-gradient severe aortic
stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction.
Echocardiography. 2011; 28: 378–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01372.x
- Tarantini G., Covolo E., Razzolini R., Bilato C., Frigo
A.C., Napodano M. et al. Valve replacement for severe
aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and left
ventricular ejection fraction exceeding 0.50. Ann. Thorac.
Surg. 2011; 91: 1808–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.057
- Orsinelli D.A., Aurigemma G.P., Battista S., Krendel S.,
Gaasch W.H. Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality
after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high
risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall
thickness. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1679–83.
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90595-r
- Dumesnil J.G., Pibarot P. Letter by Dumesnil and
Pibarot regarding article “Outcome of patients with lowgradient
“severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection
fraction.” Circulation. 2011; 124: e360. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.038497
- Vahanian A., Alfieri O., Andreotti F., Antunes M.J.,
Barón-Esquivias G., Baumgartner H. et al. Guidelines on
the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012):
the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart
Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and
the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
(EACTS). Eur. Heart J. 2012; 33: 2451–96. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109
About the authors
- Olamafruz K. Abdulloev, Postgraduate; orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-5462
-
Gufron A. Shamsiev, Dr. Med. Sc., Cardiac Surgeon; orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-5880
